SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
The efficacy of topical treatments for acanthosis nigricans: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acanthosis nigricans (AN) is a skin disorder marked by darkening and thickening of the skin, often linked to metabolic abnormalities. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assesses the comparative effectiveness and tolerability of different topical treatment options of AN, aiming to determine the most suitable therapeutic strategies. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, yielding 6,407 studies. After screening and a full-text review, seven randomized controlled trials ( Results: Urea demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing erythema, particularly at higher concentrations (20%), with mild adverse events such as stinging or irritation. Tretinoin was the most effective for reducing dark pigmentation, especially on the neck, and patients were more satisfied with it than with glycolic acid. Salicylic acid (10%) gave results similar to urea, with only mild side effects like dryness or peeling. Trichloroacetic acid (15%) peel was more effective than glycolic acid (35%) peel, both in skin improvement and patient satisfaction after 8 weeks. Overall, side effects with all treatments were mild and went away on their own. Conclusion: Both urea and tretinoin are effective treatments for AN, choice of therapy should be individualized tretinoin for predominant hyperpigmentation, urea for erythema or lower irritation tolerance, salicylic acid as a tolerable alternative, and TCA peel when stronger procedural options are suitable glycolic peel showed more modest effects. Systematic review registration: Prospero registration number: (CRD42023444441); https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023444441.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.