ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2025
Incidence and survival of vulvar and vaginal cancers in a province of Northern Italy: a population-based study.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to describe the incidence, mortality, and survival trends of vulvar and vaginal cancers in a population-based cohort from Northern Italy, with a particular focus on the development of second primary malignancies. Methods: Data were retrieved from the Cancer Registry of Reggio Emilia, covering the period 1996-2021. Vulvar and vaginal cancers were classified according to ICD-O-3 topography codes C51 and C52, respectively. Age-standardized incidence and mortality rates were calculated using the European Standard Population. Relative survival estimates were computed using the Pohar Perme method. Time trends were analyzed using Joinpoint Regression, and the occurrence of second primary malignancies was assessed based on medical records. Results: A total of 328 cases were identified: 264 vulvar (80.5 %) and 64 vaginal cancers (19.5 %). The median age at diagnosis was 76.1 years for vulvar cancer and 70.2 years for vaginal cancer. Squamous cell carcinoma was the predominant histological subtype (78 % vulvar, 57.8 % vaginal). The incidence of vulvar cancer showed a significant annual decrease (APC -2.3 %, 95 %CI -3.5; -1.0), while mortality remained stable. Vaginal cancer also exhibited a decreasing incidence trend (APC -3.3 %, 95 %CI -9.1; 2.9), though not statistically significant. The five-year survival rate was 63 % for vulvar cancer and 44 % for vaginal cancer, with a significant improvement for vaginal cancer in the years (1996-2006: 33 %; 2007-2018: 61 %). Second primary malignancies were observed in 30 patients (27 with vulvar and 3 with vaginal cancer). Conclusion: Although vulvar and vaginal cancers remain rare, their burden is significant, particularly in older women. The declining incidence may be attributed to the effects of HPV vaccination and improved screening practices. However, the stable mortality rates underscore the need for optimized treatment strategies. Given the association with second malignancies, long-term surveillance is essential to improving patient outcomes. Policy Summary: Vulvar and vaginal cancers are rare but require careful and continuous monitoring. Knowledge of the incidence curves and survival of these tumors should encourage stakeholders to invest both in terms of primary prevention (smoking cessation and sex education) but also secondary prevention by implementing screening campaigns without neglecting the importance of HPV vaccination and access to care for all, without regional disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.