ReviewRSC advances2025
Advanced technologies for plastic waste recycling: examine recent developments in plastic waste recycling technologies.
Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustainable upcycling of ABS plastic waste into nanostructured carbon for lithium-ion battery applications.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Catalytic Upcycling of Barrier Plastic Films by Selective Deoxygenation of Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol over Pd/MoOACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2026Article
- Closing the Loop on Polyurethane Foam Waste: Challenges, Emerging Technologies, and the Road to Sustainable Circularity.ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2026Review
- Closing the Loop on Personal Protective Equipment: Collection, Polymer Recovery, and Circular Pathways for Post-Consumer PPE.Polymers · 2026Review
- Engineered microbes to enable a circular economy for biodegradable plastics.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The escalating challenge of plastic waste necessitates innovative strategies that surpass conventional mechanical recycling. This review examines recent advancements in plastic waste recycling technologies, with a focus on three primary domains: chemical recycling, biological degradation, and enhanced sorting techniques. Chemical recycling employs depolymerization and pyrolysis to dismantle heterogeneous polymers into recoverable monomers, mitigating the constraints of mechanical methods on mixed waste streams. Biological approaches utilize enzymes and microbial consortia for environmentally benign degradation, with emerging engineered variants demonstrating efficacy across diverse polymer types. Furthermore, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in sorting systems enhances separation accuracy and throughput by up to 95%. Collectively, these developments foster a robust, sustainable recycling infrastructure aligned with circular economy principles. Nonetheless, barriers such as technological scalability, economic viability, and process optimization persist. This analysis evaluates these innovations' potential to elevate recycling rates, minimize ecological harm, and promote material circularity, while delineating principal obstacles and priority areas for future investigation to facilitate commercial deployment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.