ArticleJournal of psychophysiology2024
Visual Attention and Cardiac Response to Faces in Relation to Emotion Recognition.
Article in Journal of psychophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid and accurate emotion recognition is a crucial skill for social interactions, and visual attention to informative social cues in the environment can facilitate emotion recognition. Studies have found that emotion recognition is also associated with underlying cardiac autonomic responses. The current study examined (1) visual attention and cardiac response (change in heart rate) to emotionally-expressive faces and houses (as a nonsocial control image), and (2) associations between these responses and emotion recognition on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) in college students. Results showed increased overall attention, but shorter first fixation durations, to faces as compared to houses. Across faces, attention was greater to eyes than mouth, but the magnitude of this difference was dependent on emotion. Analysis of cardiac responses revealed greater heart rate deceleration to happy and fearful faces as compared to neutral faces and houses. Better emotion recognition accuracy on the RMET was related to greater attention to faces, and eyes specifically, as well as greater heart rate deceleration to faces relative to houses. No relations between visual attention and cardiac response were found. The current work points to variations in visual attention and cardiac response while viewing emotional faces that can be markers of emotion processing ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.