Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41140457›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Novel avatar-based video-guided acupuncture imagery treatment for chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial in the USA.

Sierra Hodges, Yuanyuan Li, Jiani Wu, Linting Ma, Yu Liu, Sveta Reddy, Valeria Saccà, Kathryn M Walker, Lucy Chen, Joan A Camprodon and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03765879 (Brain Mechanisms of Video-Guided Acupuncture Imagery Treatment on Chronic Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03765879 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Brain Mechanisms of Video-Guided Acupuncture Imagery Treatment on Chronic Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2019 to 2026Enrolled80ConditionsChronic PainArmsVerum VGAIT (Video-Guided Acupuncture Imagery Treatment), Sham VGAIT (Video-Guided Acupuncture Imagery Treatment)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sierra HodgesDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Yuanyuan LiDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Jiani WuDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Linting MaDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Yu LiuDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Sveta ReddyDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Valeria SaccàDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Kathryn M WalkerDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Lucy ChenDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, MGH Center for Translational Pain Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Joan A CamprodonDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Scott P OrrDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Felipe FregniNeuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Yi ZhangDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, MGH Center for Translational Pain Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Sean YaoDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Mark VangelDepartment of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Jian KongDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic low back pain (cLBP) imposes a significant public health burden. Digital health interventions are increasingly used for chronic pain management, yet effective home-based therapies remain limited. We aimed to evaluate a novel, remotely delivered avatar-based video-guided acupuncture imagery treatment (AB-VGAIT) for cLBP. Methods: This parallel-group, randomised, controlled trial was performed at Massachusetts General Hospital (MA USA). Eligible participants, aged 18-75 years, had been experiencing cLBP for over six months and had at least 4/10 clinical pain on the low back pain numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10. Enrolled participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the AB-VGAIT or the avatar-based video-guided touch imagery treatment (AB-VGTIT; control) group. Participants underwent eight treatment sessions of either AB-VGAIT or AB-VGTIT over a 4-week period, wherein avatar-based, animated videos guided participants to imagine acupuncture (AB-VGAIT) or cotton stabs (AB-VGTIT) stimulation. Outcome evaluators and statisticians were blinded to group assignments, however participant blinding was not feasible due to the visual and interactive nature of the intervention. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in pain bothersomeness after 4 weeks of treatment. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03765879. Findings: Between June 22, 2021 and July 27, 2024, 60 participants were enrolled (n = 30 per group). Five (8.33%) participants did not complete the study, two (6.67%) in the AB-VGAIT group and three (10%) in the AB-VGTIT group. Although both groups demonstrated significant reductions in pain bothersomeness from baseline (AB-VGAIT: -1.71 [-2.38 to -1.04], Interpretation: Short duration, limited treatment frequency, and small sample size may restrict generalisability. No significant difference was observed between AB-VGAIT and AB-VGTIT; although both interventions yielded significant improvements in pain relief, suggesting each may offer a promising remote, self-administered digital intervention for cLBP. The scalable, non-invasive nature may help to bridge treatment gaps, particularly for individuals with limited access to in-person care. Future larger-scale trials are warranted to validate efficacy and generalisability. Funding: National Institutes of Health/National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health.

Indexed as

Avatar-based video-guided acupuncture imagery treatmentChronic low back painDigital health interventionRandomised controlled trialRemote therapy

Identifiers

PMID41140457
PMCPMC12547178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.