Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41140449›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Role of antibiotic prophylaxis in liver transplant patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Muhammad Ahmad Nadeem, Abdul Rafeh Awan, Asad Gul Rao, Meher Ayyazuddin, Umm E Salma Shabbar Banatwala, Sobia Laique, Puneet Bansal, Shilpa Junna, Hassan Siddiki, Christine Koval and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Muhammad Ahmad NadeemDepartment of Liver Transplant Surgery, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Abdul Rafeh AwanNishtar Medical University, Multan, Pakistan.
Asad Gul RaoDow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Meher AyyazuddinCMH Lahore Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Umm E Salma Shabbar BanatwalaDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sobia LaiqueSection of Transplant Hepatology, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Puneet BansalDepartment of Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Shilpa JunnaSection of Transplant Hepatology, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Hassan SiddikiSection of Advanced Endoscopy, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Christine KovalSection of Transplant Infectious Disease, Medical Subspecialties Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Masato FujikiDepartment of Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Andrea SchlegelDepartment of Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Koji HashimotoDepartment of Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Chase J WehrleDepartment of Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jamak Modaresi EsfehSection of Transplant Hepatology, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is frequently performed in liver transplant recipients for the management of biliary complications. While frequently medically necessary, ERCP carries a risk of post-procedural infections, particularly in immunosuppressed transplant patients. Prophylactic antibiotics are sometimes recommended, but their role remains uncertain. We aimed to address this knowledge gap. Methods: This single-arm systematic review and meta-analysis included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case-control studies evaluating the use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to or during ERCP (for any indication) in liver transplant recipients. No restrictions were placed on patient age, sex, or ethnicity. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus were searched for relevant studies published between database inception and June 2025. Primary outcomes of interest were incidence of post-ERCP cholangitis, infection, or pancreatitis, incidence of overall procedural complications, and mortality attributable to procedural complications. The quality of included studies was assessed via ROBINS-I. This work is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024604381. Findings: This review included 26 studies involving more than 3800 liver transplant recipients undergoing over 7300 ERCP procedures. All studies were non-randomised, comprising nine prospective and 17 retrospective studies. The pooled complication rate was 25.7% per patient and 6.7% per procedure; the pooled cholangitis rate was 8.6% per patient and 3.5% per procedure; and the pooled pancreatitis rate was 6.1% per patient and 1.9% per procedure. In the overall cohort, the pooled mortality rate due to post-ERCP complications was 1.1% with two deaths reported among 594 patients. Both fatalities were attributed to sepsis secondary to cholangitis. Bile cultures were positive in 80.1% of the samples with a sensitivity of 63.7% to prophylactic antibiotics used and 24.3% of isolates resistant to more than one antibiotic. The highest resistance was observed against gentamicin (54.1%) and ceftriaxone (53.7%) while resistance was lower for piperacillin/tazobactam (26.2%) and carbapenems (26.6%). Resistance rates were higher in transplant recipients compared to the general ERCP population. Interpretation: Despite widespread prophylactic antibiotic use, post-ERCP infections and antimicrobial resistance remain prevalent in liver transplant recipients. These findings support more targeted prophylactic strategies using agents with lower resistance rates, particularly in patients undergoing repeat ERCPs. This single-arm analysis did not include a direct comparator group of patients without antibiotic prophylaxis. Future prospective studies and randomised controlled trials are essential to determine the optimal prophylactic regimen, dose, and duration in this high-risk population. Funding: None.

Indexed as

AntibioticsERCPLiver transplantMultidrug resistant organismsProphylaxisResistance

Identifiers

PMID41140449
PMCPMC12546977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.