ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Development and validation of an artificial intelligence system for triple-negative breast cancer identification and prognosis prediction: a multicentre retrospective study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Applications in Diagnosis, Treatment Response, and Prognosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in digital pathology diagnosis and analysis: technologies, challenges, and future prospects.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for perioperative precision in surgical oncology.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), recognised as the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, has a high recurrence rate and poor treatment outcomes. Current diagnosis relies heavily on immunohistochemistry, which can be time-consuming and costly, while prognostic stratification remains limited by traditional clinicopathological features. This study aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered TNBC identification and prognosis prediction (TRIP) system using haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained pathology images. Methods: In this multicentre retrospective study, we analysed haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole slide images (WSIs) of 2045 patients with breast cancer from The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (FAH) between June 1, 2007 and December 31, 2022. Among these, 451 patients with TNBC had follow-up outcomes on disease-free survival and overall survival. Patients were excluded if they had other synchronous malignant neoplasms within five years or had previously received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We developed and validated a deep learning system, TRIP, to classify TNBC versus other breast cancer subtypes and predict the cancer disease-free survival and overall survival on the FAH cohort. We employed the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to evaluate TNBC identification performance, and the concordance index (C-index) to evaluate the performance of disease-free survival and overall survival predictions. Beyond internal validation, the system was externally evaluated on independent retrospective cohorts from four tertiary hospitals in Eastern and Central China (Shandong Provincial Hospital [SDPH], Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University [SRRS], Yiwu Central Hospital [YWCH], and The Central Hospital of Wuhan [WHCH]) between June 26, 2013 and December 31, 2024, and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset between January 1, 1988 and December 31, 2013, comprising 2793 cases for TNBC identification and 463 cases for prognosis prediction. Model interpretability was enhanced using pathology heatmaps, and multi-omics analysis was conducted to explore TNBC heterogeneity. Findings: The deep-learning model achieved an AUC of 0.980, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.958-0.996, for identifying TNBC in the internal cohort, and AUCs of 0.916 (95% CI: 0.848-0.959), 0.936 (95% CI: 0.907-0.962), 0.860 (95% CI: 0.779-0.930), and 0.890 (95% CI: 0.841-0.929) in the SDPH, SRRS, WHCH, and TCGA external validation cohorts, respectively. Moreover, it effectively predicted disease-free survival with a C-index of 0.747 ± 0.070 (95% CI: 0.617-0.852) in the internal cohort and C-indices of 0.731 ± 0.047 (95% CI: 0.623-0.839) and 0.732 ± 0.043 (95% CI: 0.621-0.840) in the SDPH, SRRS, YWCH cohorts combined (EXSURV), and the TCGA cohort, respectively, and overall survival with a C-index of 0.744 ± 0.075 (95% CI: 0.602-0.865) in the internal cohort and C-indices of 0.720 ± 0.034 (95% CI: 0.566-0.865) and 0.721 ± 0.030 (95% CI: 0.625-0.818) in the EXSURV and TCGA cohorts, respectively. Heatmaps revealed key histologic features of TNBC, including nuclear atypia, necrosis, and immune-cold microenvironments in aggressive cases, while lymphoplasmacytic infiltration indicated better prognosis. Multi-omics analysis identified three molecular subtypes with distinct immune and pro-tumour signalling profiles, supporting the TRIP system's prognostic accuracy in alignment with molecular evidence. Interpretation: TRIP is an effective and interpretable artificial intelligence system that demonstrates strong performance in identifying TNBC and predicting its disease-free survival and overall survival. However, the current findings are primarily derived from post-surgical tissue data and do not incorporate clinical variables, which limits the system's immediate applicability in pre-operative settings. To overcome these constraints, future prospective studies should be conducted to validate its clinical utility, particularly in pre-operative and broader real-world scenarios. Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China; Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Commission; Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China; and National Health Commission Scientific Research Fund, China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.