ArticleJournal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base2025
Radiomic Applications in Skull Base Pathology: A Systematic Review of Potential Clinical Uses.
Article in Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Molecular biology and treatment strategies for tumors of middle and inner ear.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Radiomics involves the extraction and analysis of numerous quantitative features of medical imaging which can add more information from radiological images often beyond initial comprehension of a clinician. Unlike deep learning, radiomics allows some understanding of identified quantitative features for clinical prediction. We sought to explore the current state of radiomics applications in the skull base literature. Methods: A systematic review of studies evaluating radiomics in skull base was performed, including those with and without machine-learning approaches. Studies were summarized into thematic elements as well as specific pathologies. Results: A total of 102 studies with 26,280 radiographic images were included. The earliest radiomic study was published in 2017 with exponential growth in research since then. Most studies focused on tumor diagnosis (40.8%), followed by tumor prognosis (31.1%), automated segmentation (16.5%), other applications (7.8%), and lastly prediction of intraoperative features (3.9%). Pituitary adenomas (41.7%) and vestibular schwannomas (18.4%) represented the most commonly evaluated pathologies; however, radiomics could be applied to a heterogeneous collection of skull base pathologies. The average study included 258 ± 677 cases (range 4; 6,755). Conclusion: Radiomics offers many functions in treating skull base pathology and will likely be an essential component of future clinical care. Larger sample sizes, validation of predictive models, and clinical application are needed. Further investigation into the strengths and weaknesses of radiomic applications in skull base treatments is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.