ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Near-infrared prediction of total phosphorus in leaves content in korla fragrant pear with growth period specificity via spectral modeling.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leaf total phosphorus content (LTP) is a key indicator for assessing fruit nutrition status. As a rapid non-destructive inspection method, Near-infrared spectroscopy technology is susceptible to the influence of changes in plant growth periods and spectral noise on its prediction accuracy. At present, how to synergistically utilize growth period information and Spectral pre - processing methods to optimize the LTP Prediction model remains to be further studied. The study systematically collected Leaf sample and their near-infrared Spectral data during three key growth periods of Korla fragrant pear (fruit-setting period, fruit swelling period, and Maturity period). In the Spectral pre-processing stage, multiple scattering correction, Savitzky-Golay Smooth, First Derivative (FD), Second Derivative (SD) and their combined algorithms were comprehensively applied. The Competitive Adaptive Reweighted Sampling (CARS) algorithm was used for characteristic wavelength selection, and based on this, Growth period specificity BP neural network model and cross-growth period general prediction models were constructed respectively to evaluate the performance of different Modeling strategies. Results The study showed that LTP content exhibited a significant differential distribution across different growing stage. In the characteristic wavelength bands, after processing with Combined pre-processing method (e.g., MSC+ FD), the correlation coefficient between the spectrum and LTP content significantly increased to approximately 0.90. The predictive performance of the Growth-period-specific model was comprehensively superior to that of the general model, with the Validation set coefficient of determination remaining above 0.83. Compared with the general model, the Coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.