Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41140366›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of radiology2025

The DVT Recanalisation Scale (DVT RS): a novel tool for standardised assessment of venous recanalisation in deep vein thrombosis.

Arkadiusz Kacała, Jędrzej Fischer, Krzysztof Dyś, Andrzej Szuba, Maciej Guziński

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arkadiusz KacałaDepartment of Radiology, Division of General and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland.
Jędrzej FischerDepartment and Clinic of Angiology and Internal Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland.
Krzysztof DyśDepartment of Radiology, Division of General and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland.
Andrzej SzubaDepartment and Clinic of Angiology and Internal Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland.
Maciej GuzińskiDepartment of Radiology, Division of General and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a prevalent vascular condition that can lead to serious complications, including pulmonary embolism and post-thrombotic syndrome. Despite advances in endovascular therapies, the absence of a standardised method for evaluating venous recanalisation impedes consistent outcome reporting and inter-study comparisons. We developed the DVT Recanalisation Scale (DVT RS), integrating anatomical and functional criteria to provide a reproducible method for assessing recanalisation following endovascular treatment of DVT. Material and methods: This retrospective pilot study included 31 patients with predominantly iliofemoral DVT treated via catheter-directed thromboaspiration and other endovascular techniques. Recanalisation was assessed using phlebographic imaging acquired in multiple projections with compression manoeuvres. Four independent operators (three interventional radiologists, one interventional angiologist) scored recanalisation using the DVT RS. The scale classifies recanalisation into five grades: Grade 0 (no recanalisation), Grade 1 (partial recanalisation without spontaneous flow), Grade 2A (flow with stenosis > 50%), Grade 2B (flow with residual stenosis < 50%), and Grade 3 (complete recanalisation with normal flow). A supplemental "(S)" suffix indicates use of stenting. Interobserver reliability was measured using Cohen's k. Results: Interobserver agreement exceeded 90%, with Cohen's k > 0.90 ( Conclusions: The DVT RS is a reproducible and adaptable tool for standardising the assessment of venous recanalisation. It supports improved outcome reporting and facilitates robust comparisons between clinical endpoints and intravascular results. Prospective validation in larger cohorts is needed.

Indexed as

deep vein thrombosisendovascular treatmentIVUSrecanalizationstandardisation

Identifiers

PMID41140366
PMCPMC12547883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.