Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41140357›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of radiology2025

Attention-enhanced deep learning for cervical cytology: combining convolutional networks with multi-head attention and fuzzy logic.

Garima Verma, Anurag Barthwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Garima VermaSchool of Computing, DIT University, Dehradun, India.
Anurag BarthwalComputing Science and Engineering, Chinmaya Vishwa Vidyapeeth, Ernakulam, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Cervical cancer continues to be one of the leading causes of death among females worldwide, and thus early diagnosis by using more advanced diagnostic procedures is crucial. The conventional Pap-smear procedure is accurate but subject to human error; thus, computerised, standardised, and automated diagnosis becomes imperative. Herein we present a novel framework of a fuzzy distance-based ensemble of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for efficient cervical cancer classification from Pap-smear images. Material and methods: The proposed approach integrates 5 models of CNN - Simple CNN, InceptionV3, Xception, Xception with Attention, and Inception Attention - via attention mechanisms to advance feature learning. A fuzzy distance-based aggregator function is introduced to fuse the predictions of these models optimally as per Euclidean, Manhattan, and cosine distance measures. Four advanced pre-processing techniques - wavelet denoising, contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalisation (CLAHE), background correction, and Laplacian sharpening - are employed to construct a cleaner dataset with enhanced image sharpness and segmentation. Results: Experimental outcomes prove that the model is significantly better than state-of-the-art approaches, with an accuracy of 94% on the original dataset and 98.3% on the pre-processed dataset. Conclusions: The method suggested herein has better noise robustness, interpretability through fuzzy logic, and automatic adaptation to various CNN frameworks without fine-tuning. These results acknowledge the promise of fuzzy logic-based CNN ensembles to improve machine-based cervical cancer diagnosis, which could be mapped to better and scalable diagnostic instruments in medical imaging.

Indexed as

cervical cancerCNNdeep learningfuzzy logicimage pre-processingtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41140357
PMCPMC12550697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.