ArticlePolish journal of radiology2025
Preliminary experience with dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging: a single-centre perspective.
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to optimise the dynamic coronary computed tomography perfusion (CTP) protocol, focusing on patient preparation, scanning parameters, and image acquisition, reconstruction, and interpretation. Future phases will evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic CTP in detecting haemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (CAD), using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) as reference standards. Material and methods: Thirty-six symptomatic patients with confirmed or suspected CAD underwent dynamic CTP using a whole-heart coverage CT scanner (Revolution Apex CT, GE Healthcare). Two patients were excluded due to non-diagnostic CTP results. Of the remaining 34 patients, 24 underwent both cardiac CT angiography (CCTA) and CTP, while 19 underwent CCTA, CTP, and ICA. Preliminary data were analysed by comparing CTP findings with CCTA and ICA/FFR when available. Results: Among 578 myocardial segments, 424 (73.3%) showed normal perfusion and 154 (26.6%) exhibited hypoperfusion. Of the 17 cases with perfusion deficits, ICA confirmed significant stenosis in 10, resulting in 100% sensitivity and 22% specificity for detecting haemodynamically significant stenosis. FFR assessment in 10 patients demonstrated 60% concordance between CTP, ICA, and FFR. Incorporating CTP into the diagnostic pathway led to a 29.4% reclassification in management strategies. Conclusions: The low specificity observed for detecting significant CAD underscores the need for further refinement of the CTP protocol. Future research should aim to optimise myocardial blood flow thresholds to improve diagnostic specificity and clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.