ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2025
Large-bore catheter selection in endovascular management of superior vena cava syndrome.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Catheter-directed thrombectomy combined with angioplasty and stent implantation for superior vena cava syndrome: a case report.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is a clinical condition caused by obstruction of blood flow through the SVC, leading to facial swelling, dyspnea, and upper extremity edema. To date, no established guidelines exist regarding optimal device selection for thrombectomy in acute SVCS, and endovascular management with mechanical thrombectomy remains underreported in the literature. We discuss two similarly presenting cases of acute SVCS managed with different large-bore thrombectomy platforms-AngioDynamics AlphaVac and Inari FlowTriever-to highlight the need for case-specific device selection and to compare clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.