ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Reduced Adult Survival Estimated in Areas of Decline of Harbour Seal Populations in Scotland.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reduced Adult Survival Estimated in Areas of Decline of Harbour Seal Populations in Scotland.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the demographic drivers behind observed changes in wild populations is key to inferring intrinsic and extrinsic causes behind such changes. In Scotland, harbour seal populations have undergone regional declines since the early 2000s. Here, we apply mark-recapture models to photo-identification data collected during the breeding season at haulout sites representative of three areas with contrasting population trajectories to estimate sex-specific apparent adult survival and fecundity rates. Apparent adult survival rates were lower at the declining site of Burray, located within the North Coast and Orkney Seal Monitoring Unit (SMU), which has declined by 85% since the mid-1990s: female survival = 0.844 (95% CI 0.803-0.878) and male survival = 0.826 (95% CI 0.751-0.883) (photo-ID data collected in 2016-2022). At stable or increasing sites, estimated apparent adult survival rates were higher: at Dunvegan, located in the West Coast SMU, a region that has been generally increasing since monitoring started in the mid-1990s: female survival = 0.878 (95% CI 0.810-0.924) and male survival = 0.842 (95% CI 0.756-0.902) (photo-ID data collected in 2016-2022); at Loch Fleet, located in the Moray Firth SMU, which has shown no trend since 2003: female survival = 0.941 (95% CI 0.922-0.956) and male survival = 0.919 (95% CI 0.888-0.942) (photo-ID data collected 2006-2021). Mark-recapture fecundity rates were generally high at all sites (0.809 to 0.883), with the lowest estimated fecundity at the declining site of Burray. The results indicate that the causes of the decline are likely acting on adult survival, while evidence that a decrease in fecundity is driving the observed declines had less support. The estimated vital rates inform current research into potential causes of the declines and can be incorporated into stage-structured population dynamic models to investigate whether the hypothesised mechanisms for decline are supported by the data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.