ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2025
Antimicrobial resistance among agents of community-associated lower respiratory tract infection in the UK and Ireland: trends from 1999/2000 to 2018/2019.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two decades of resistance surveillance by the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy: design, development, delivery, deficiencies and future directions.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Article
- The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Resistance Surveillance Project: methods and limitations.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Trends of serotypes and resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae in the UK and Ireland (1999-2019).The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe BSAC Respiratory Surveillance Programme examined resistance trends among Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis from patients with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infection (CA-LRTI).
methodsQuotas of isolates were sought per collecting site from 1999/00 to 2018/19; an annual October start date captured winter infection peaks within single years. MIC testing was by BSAC agar dilution. β-Lactamase detection with nitrocefin and pneumococcal serotyping by classical methods or WGS.
resultsResistances were uncommon, except that β-lactamases occurred in c. 20% of H. influenzae from 2012/13 following earlier rises, and in >90% of M. catarrhalis throughout. Only 0.11% (12/10881) of S. pneumoniae were fully resistant to penicillin; co-amoxiclav inhibited 97.8% of 13526 H. influenzae and >99.9% of 6309 M. catarrhalis isolates. Cefotaxime inhibited >99% of all isolates at breakpoint, as did relevant fluoroquinolones in the fewer years tested. Tetracycline inhibited >98% of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis and 85% of S. pneumoniae. Significant shifts were: (i) fluctuating resistances to tetracyclines, macrolides and penicillin in pneumococci, reflecting serotype replacements; (ii) expansion, from 2012/13, in the proportion of H. influenzae with β-lactamase-independent amoxicillin/co-amoxiclav resistance; and (iii) increasing high-level amoxicillin resistance (MIC > 64 mg/L) among β-lactamase-positive H. influenzae. MIC differentials were seen for cephalosporins between β-lactamase-positive and β-lactamase-negative M. catarrhalis, greatest (512-fold) for ceftaroline.
conclusionsCA-LRTI remains eminently treatable, yet shifts are occurring in the serotypes of S. pneumoniae most associated with resistance and in the nature of amoxicillin resistance in H. influenzae. β-Lactamase-related cephalosporin MIC differentials for M. catarrhalis are striking but their clinical significance remains uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.