ArticleJournal of educational evaluation for health professions2025
Perceptions of faculty and medical students regarding an undergraduate research culture activity in Myanmar: a qualitative study.
Article in Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study explored the perceptions of faculty members and third-year medical students regarding the research culture activity (RCA), a program designed to engage undergraduates in research at the University of Medicine, Mandalay, Myanmar. It aimed to identify the knowledge, attitudes, and skills (KAS) gained, the challenges encountered, and suggestions for improvement.
methodsThis qualitative study employed 4 semi-structured focus group discussions with 17 third-year medical students and 16 faculty members who participated in the 2020 RCA. Student responses related to KAS were analyzed using a deductive framework approach, while challenges and suggestions were examined through inductive thematic analysis. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim in Burmese, translated into English, and collaboratively coded using Atlas.ti version 9.0.5.
resultsParticipants reported improved understanding of scientific literature, greater responsibility, strengthened teamwork, and enhanced practical research skills. Reported challenges included limited research preparedness, scheduling conflicts, inconsistent supervision, financial constraints, and weak coordination with inpatient clinicians. Participants also suggested clearer guidelines, pre-research training, protected time, stronger supervision, and institutional budgetary support.
conclusionThe RCA provides substantial educational value in developing research competencies and remains a promising, potentially adaptable model for resource-limited settings. Its sustainability will depend on institutional commitment, supervisory capacity, and modest financial investment. Future research should prospectively assess KAS outcomes, compare supervision models and group sizes, evaluate digital workflows for efficiency, and conduct long-term follow-up of graduates' scholarly activities to build evidence for scalable implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.