ReviewBJPsych open2025
Behaviours that challenge in children with intellectual disability: systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions.
Review in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBehaviours that challenge are highly prevalent in children with an intellectual disability and can be detrimental to their quality of life and opportunities.
aimsThe systematic review aimed to investigate the effectiveness of current interventions in reducing behaviours that challenge in children with an intellectual disability (≤18 years-old).
methodWe searched five databases (PsychINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL) on 26 April 2022 and 1 July 2024, and identified 18 randomised controlled trials (1443 participants) eligible for inclusion since 2014 - 11 investigated non-pharmacological and 9 investigated pharmacological interventions. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.
resultsNon-pharmacological interventions (mostly psychosocial) were significantly effective (Hedges'
conclusionsIt is important to note that most studies included were conducted in Western countries and had small sample sizes, and findings may be due to the outcome measures used. Findings support current recommendations that non-pharmacological interventions should be first-line treatment for behaviours that challenge in this population. Evidence highlighted the need for better quality, adequately powered randomised controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.