ArticleBJPsych open2025
Validation of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Predominant Presentation Matter? Examining Functional and Symptom Changes After Cognitive Behavioural Therapy.Clinical psychology & psychotherapyTrial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAttention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is often associated with psychosocial functioning difficulties and valid measures of disability are needed for this population. The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is widely used to measure disability but has not been validated in the adult ADHD population.
aimsThis study aims to assess the psychometric properties of the WHODAS 2.0 in adults with ADHD, and to examine differences in disability levels between ADHD subtypes and gender.
methodA cross-sectional study was conducted with 577 adults with ADHD (mean age: 38.24, s.d = 12.23; 52.3% male). ADHD severity was assessed using the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale, while functionality was measured with the WHODAS 2.0 and the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST). Analyses included: (a) Cronbach's
resultsThe WHODAS 2.0 demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's
conclusionsThe WHODAS 2.0 demonstrates psychometric properties that suggest it is a valid and reliable tool for assessing disability in adults with ADHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.