Observational studyCurrent cardiology reviews2026
Real-world Review of Adherence to Guideline-directed Intravenous Iron Therapy in Heart Failure Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Oman.
Observational study in Current cardiology reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInternational guidelines recommend intravenous (IV) iron replacement in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF or HFmrEF) and iron deficiency (ID). IV iron therapy remains underutilised despite growing evidence of its positive impact on hospitalisation rates, quality of life, and symptom control in HF. In this study, we aimed to explore the prevalence of ID and adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for ID in HF patients.
methodsIt was a retrospective observational study performed at a tertiary hospital in Oman. All HF patients admitted between March 2022 and February 2024 were included. ID was defined as serum ferritin less than 100 μg/L or serum ferritin 100-299 μg/L with transferrin saturation (TSAT) of less than 20%. Patients in intensive care units, pregnant women, and those with HF with preserved LVEF (HFpEF) were excluded. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Only 26% (n=97) of 376 patients with HFrEF/HFmrEF were screened for ID, and about half of them (n=52) were found to be iron deficient. ID was tested more often in patients with anemia compared to those without anemia (33.9% vs. 10.7%, p < 0.001). IV iron in the form of iron carboxymaltose (FCM) was administered in 19% of ID patients, but only 15% received the recommended dose of 1000 mg FCM. There was no statistically significant difference in patient demographics or comorbidities between patients with or without ID.
conclusionAmong 376 HF patients screened for ID, almost half were iron deficient. However, the compliance rate of IV FCM therapy remained quite low. Low screening rates and limited adherence to GDMT underscore the need for standardized hospital protocols for the management of ID in HF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.