ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2026
Synthetic Polymer-Based Interventions in Wound Healing: A Clinical Perspective on their Efficacy and Limitations.
Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced Hydrogel Functionalization Strategies for Burn-Related Wound Treatment.Biomaterials research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWound healing is a complex and dynamic biological process involving hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and tissue remodeling. Conventional wound dressings provide only passive protection and fail to maintain an optimal healing microenvironment. Synthetic polymers, such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polycaprolactone (PCL), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and polyethylene glycol (PEG), have emerged as promising materials in advanced wound care due to their tunable physicochemical properties, biocompatibility, and enhanced therapeutic functionality.
aimThis review aims to evaluate the potential of synthetic polymers in wound healing applications, focusing on their structural and functional advantages, challenges, and opportunities in the development of nextgeneration wound dressings. METHODOLOGY: A comprehensive literature review was conducted on recent developments in polymer-based wound dressings. In this review, we conducted a systematic literature search across Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed for publications between 2015 and 2025. The search strategy employed keywords, such as "wound healing", "polyvinyl alcohol", "polycaprolactone", "poly(lactic-coglycolic acid)", "polyethylene alcohol", "physicochemical characteristics", "drug delivery capabilities", and " clinical trial" to capture the research landscape.
resultsSynthetic polymers demonstrated significant potential in overcoming limitations of natural biomaterials, such as poor mechanical strength and rapid degradation. PEG-based hydrogels exhibited excellent hydrophilicity and sustained drug release. PCL scaffolds offered mechanical durability and supported tissue regeneration. PLGA allowed controlled therapeutic release through tunable degradation, while PVA ensured prolonged wound protection due to its structural stability. Polymer modifications, including crosslinking and blending, further enhanced wound healing efficacy.
conclusionSynthetic polymers provide versatile platforms for designing multifunctional wound dressings with improved healing outcomes. Future research should emphasize biodegradable, patient-specific, and smart wound dressings integrating controlled drug delivery, infection prevention, and angiogenic stimulation, thereby revolutionizing wound management practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41140077What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.