Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41139981›Full record

ArticlePsychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society2025

Identification of Hasegawa Dementia Scale-Revised Cutoff Scores Associated With Mini-Mental State Examination Thresholds for Anti-Amyloid β Therapies in Patients With Amnesia.

Kei Yamakami, Tomoyasu Matsubara, Koji Fujita, Kazumi Nakamura, Naoki Kihara, Kazuki Sogawa, Ryohei Nakao, Kenta Hanada, Yuki Yamamoto, Shotaro Haji and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kei YamakamiDepartment of Neurology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6448-1949
Tomoyasu MatsubaraDepartment of Neurology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7559-8284
Koji FujitaDepartment of Neurology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4789-1579
Kazumi NakamuraDepartment of Neurology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Naoki KiharaDepartment of Neurology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Kazuki SogawaDepartment of Neurology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Ryohei NakaoDepartment of Neurology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Kenta HanadaDepartment of Neurology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Yuki YamamotoDepartment of Neurology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Shotaro HajiDepartment of Neurology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Yoichi OtomiDepartment of Radiology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8960-3662
Masafumi HaradaDepartment of Radiology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Yuishin IzumiDepartment of Neurology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3048-9041

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP18he1402001Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP24re0122001Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP25dk0207068Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP24K15767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate Hasegawa Dementia Scale-Revised (HDS-R) cutoff scores that correspond to Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) thresholds for identifying candidates for anti-amyloid β (Aβ) therapies. Additionally, we conducted exploratory analyses to examine the cognitive subdomains associated with Aβ status.

methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study included consecutive patients with amnesia who underwent neuropsychological examinations and Aβ assessment through cerebrospinal fluid analysis or positron emission tomography. Diagnostic accuracy for MMSE thresholds (≥ 20, ≥ 22 and ≥ 24) was assessed, and two HDS-R cutoffs (high-sensitivity, high-specificity) were determined for each threshold. We examined differences in cognitive subdomains between Aβ-positive and Aβ-negative patients with MMSE score ≥ 20.

resultsOf 234 patients, 143 (61.1%) were Aβ-positive. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting MMSE score ≥ 20, ≥ 22 and ≥ 24 was 0.92, 0.90 and 0.91, respectively. High-sensitivity cutoffs, defined as scores that maximised specificity while maintaining sensitivity ≥ 80%, were HDS-R score ≥ 16, ≥ 17 and ≥ 18. Conversely, high-specificity cutoffs, defined as scores that maximised sensitivity while maintaining specificity ≥ 80%, were HDS-R score ≥ 19, ≥ 20 and ≥ 21, respectively. Subdomain analysis of MMSE and HDS-R showed Aβ-positive patients had lower scores in delayed recall and higher scores in calculation than Aβ-negative patients (all p < 0.01). In HDS-R subdomains, visual memory scores were also lower in Aβ-positive patients than in Aβ-negative patients (p < 0.01).

conclusionsThe identified HDS-R cutoff scores were associated with MMSE-defined cognitive thresholds and may serve as a potential reference for identifying patients who could be eligible for anti-Aβ therapies. The cognitive profile observed in Aβ-positive patients was characterised by deficits in delayed recall and in visual memory and by relatively preserved calculation ability, suggesting a selective vulnerability pattern in early Alzheimer's disease.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmnesiaAmyloid beta-PeptidesMental Status and Dementia TestsAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPositron-Emission TomographyRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityAmyloid beta-PeptidesAlzheimer's diseaseamyloidHasegawa Dementia Scale‐Revisedmental status and dementia testsmild cognitive impairmentMini‐Mental State Examination

Identifiers

PMID41139981
PMCPMC12555022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.