ReviewAustralian dental journal2025
Guided Endodontics-Potential and Limitations.
Review in Australian dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impedance-Guided Localisation of Pulp Chambers and Canal Orifices in Calcified Root Canal Systems: Biological Foundations and Conceptual Application.International endodontic journal · 2026Review
- Article
- Static-Guided Endodontics for Complex Intracanal Obstructions and Zirconia Post Removal: Report on Three Cases.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guided Endodontics has emerged as a digital treatment concept designed to overcome the challenges associated with conventional access cavity preparation in teeth with pulp canal calcification. Calcification of the pulp (also referred to as obliteration or mineralization), often caused by trauma or chronic irritative stimuli, presents a substantial clinical obstacle during endodontic treatment. The advent of computer-assisted technologies such as static and dynamic navigation systems has enabled highly precise and minimally invasive localization of root canal orifices, even in cases of severe calcification. This narrative review explores the clinical indications, technical workflows, and current evidence for both static and dynamic Guided Endodontics, including their limitations and future directions. Numerous in vitro and clinical studies have shown that guided access preparation results in higher precision, reduced dentine loss, and increased success rates compared to freehand techniques, even when performed by less experienced clinicians. While static navigation provides excellent accuracy for straight canals, its application in posterior teeth and curved canals remains limited. Dynamic navigation, in contrast, offers greater intraoperative flexibility but requires significant training and costly equipment. Future developments, including augmented reality integration and MRI-based workflows, may further expand the applicability of Guided Endodontics. However, the current techniques are limited by cost, planning time, and the necessity for advanced imaging. Despite these challenges, Guided Endodontics has the potential to transform the management of calcified canals and represents a significant step forward in minimally invasive endodontics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.