Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41139954›Full record

ReviewAustralian dental journal2025

Guided Endodontics-Potential and Limitations.

Thomas Connert, Elias Walter, Leander Benz, Falk Schwendicke, Wadim Leontiev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Australian dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas ConnertDepartment of Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel UZB, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4461-5835
Elias WalterDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4802-2279
Leander BenzDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Falk SchwendickeDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1223-1669
Wadim LeontievDepartment of Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel UZB, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7857-1511

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guided Endodontics has emerged as a digital treatment concept designed to overcome the challenges associated with conventional access cavity preparation in teeth with pulp canal calcification. Calcification of the pulp (also referred to as obliteration or mineralization), often caused by trauma or chronic irritative stimuli, presents a substantial clinical obstacle during endodontic treatment. The advent of computer-assisted technologies such as static and dynamic navigation systems has enabled highly precise and minimally invasive localization of root canal orifices, even in cases of severe calcification. This narrative review explores the clinical indications, technical workflows, and current evidence for both static and dynamic Guided Endodontics, including their limitations and future directions. Numerous in vitro and clinical studies have shown that guided access preparation results in higher precision, reduced dentine loss, and increased success rates compared to freehand techniques, even when performed by less experienced clinicians. While static navigation provides excellent accuracy for straight canals, its application in posterior teeth and curved canals remains limited. Dynamic navigation, in contrast, offers greater intraoperative flexibility but requires significant training and costly equipment. Future developments, including augmented reality integration and MRI-based workflows, may further expand the applicability of Guided Endodontics. However, the current techniques are limited by cost, planning time, and the necessity for advanced imaging. Despite these challenges, Guided Endodontics has the potential to transform the management of calcified canals and represents a significant step forward in minimally invasive endodontics.

Indexed as

Dental Pulp CalcificationEndodonticsRoot Canal TherapySurgery, Computer-AssistedHumansRoot Canal Preparation

Identifiers

PMID41139954
PMCPMC12747600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.