Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41139930›Full record

ReviewBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2026

AOSNP-ADAPTR resource level-based recommendations on practical diagnostic strategies for WHO CNS5 adult-type diffuse gliomas.

Vani Santosh, Chitra Sarkar, Shilpa Rao, Ho-Keung Ng, Junji Shibahara, Maysa Al-Hussaini, Michael E Buckland, Sung-Hye Park, Tarik Tihan, Pieter Wesseling and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Neurooncology: 2026 update.Free neuropathology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Vani SantoshDepartment of Neuropathology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, India.
Chitra SarkarDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4315-9316
Shilpa RaoDepartment of Neuropathology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3067-6557
Ho-Keung NgDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2614-2213
Junji ShibaharaDepartment of Pathology, Kyorin University of Medicine, Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan.
Maysa Al-HussainiDepartment of Cell Therapy and Applied Genomics, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6392-150X
Michael E BucklandDepartment of Neuropathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, NWS, Australia.
Sung-Hye ParkDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8681-1597
Tarik TihanDepartment of Pathology, Neuropathology Unit, University of Miami Miller School, Miami, USA.
Pieter WesselingDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/VU University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5453-5201
David N LouisDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Takashi KomoriDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Tokyo Metropolitan Neurological Hospital, Tokyo Metropolitan Hospital Organization, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fifth edition of the WHO classification of CNS Tumors (WHO CNS5) has revised the diagnostic and grading criteria for Adult-type Diffuse Gliomas (ADGs) by integrating molecular parameters with histologic features. Conducting molecular testing for most ADGs is now crucial in fulfilling the WHO CNS5 diagnostic criteria. However, due to additional costs and technical barriers, implementing molecular diagnostics is often not feasible in Low-Income Countries (LICs) and Lower Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). Therefore, practical approaches are needed for diagnosis in resource-restrained settings. Hence, the Asian Oceanian Society of Neuropathology (AOSNP), through the 'ADAPTR' (Adapting Diagnostic Approaches for Practical Taxonomy in Resource-Restrained Regions) initiative, aimed to provide resource-stratified recommendations for diagnosing ADGs based on available resources while adhering to the WHO guidelines as much as possible. ADAPTR identified different resource levels (RLs) of diagnostic pathology services, ranging from RL I to RL V, with RL I to RL IV being applicable to the LMICs, and provides recommendations for a 'Histology-oriented integrated diagnosis format' for each tumor type at different RLs. In addition, diagnostic flow charts for ADGs have been generated to suit these RLs. The emphasis is mainly on using histopathological approaches with immunohistochemistry, while molecular testing recommendation is categorized as 'can be considered', 'highly recommended' or 'obligatory', to reach the next level diagnosis. In each RL, either a WHO CNS5 diagnosis with an accompanying CNS WHO grade or an ADAPTR descriptive diagnosis with an associated ADAPTR histologic grade is provided, depending on the context. ADAPTR recommendations are therefore a practical adaptation of the WHO CNS5 guidelines that will suit routine diagnostic practices in resource-restrained regions.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsGliomaAdultHumansWorld Health Organizationadult‐type diffuse gliomasAOSNP‐ADAPTRLMICsrecommendationsresource‐restrained regions

Identifiers

PMID41139930
PMCPMC12861567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.