ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025
Cost of treatment of metastatic non-small lung cancer in Sweden, 2011-2023.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metastatic NSCLC patients in the real world in Finland.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeMetastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) contributes to the economic burden. Over the past decade, treatment has evolved with the introduction of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-targeted, and immune-oncology (IO) drugs. However, limited evidence exists on the long-term costs of mNSCLC treatments in Sweden. Patient/material and methods: This population-based retrospective study used data from the National Board of Health and Welfare, identifying patients initially diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC between 2011 and 2020. Healthcare costs, including inpatient care, outpatient care, and drug expenses, were assessed using Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) tariffs and prescription data. Drug expenses exceeding DRG tariff limits, such as IO drugs, were calculated separately based on retail list prices. Costs were analyzed over 5 years post-diagnosis and adjusted to 2023 values.
resultsA total of 17,107 patients were included. IO drug use increased sharply after 2016, becoming the predominant therapy. EGFR- and ALK-targeted drug use steadily increased. Overall costs rose over time, especially in the first year after diagnosis. The first-year mean cost was highest among patients receiving IO drugs (€105,286), primarily due to drug acquisition, but declined in subsequent years. ALK- and EGFR-targeted therapies also had high initial costs but remained stable thereafter.
interpretationThis study highlights the increasing economic burden of mNSCLC treatment in Sweden, driven by the targeted and IO drugs. While ALK-, EGFR-targeted, and IO drugs contribute to high first-year mean costs, IO drug costs decline significantly in subsequent years after diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.