ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026
Importance and spatial patterns of invisible fisheries in Amazonian clear-water rivers as revealed by fisher knowledge and collaboration.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Importance and spatial patterns of invisible fisheries in Amazonian clear-water rivers as revealed by fisher knowledge and collaboration.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Brazilian Amazon contains the world's most diverse fish assemblages. These assemblages can be affected by freshwater fisheries, which provide food and income for riverine people, and by accelerating environmental change. We collaborated with local fishers to provide a comprehensive assessment of the spatial patterns of fish use in 3 clear-water rivers in the Brazilian Amazon: the Tapajos, Trombetas, and Tocantins. We interviewed 638 fishers in 39 communities about fish use for domestic consumption or sale, daily catches per fisher, and catch per unit effort (CPUE). We then assessed the influence of river identity, protected areas (PAs), forest cover, and landscape complexity (independent variables) on catches and CPUE estimated from interviews (response variables) through linear models. We also analyzed data from participatory catch monitoring in 21 communities along the Tapajos River (5668 fish landings). Twenty-one fish species were the most harvested and cited by interview respondents, 16 of which were migratory fishes, accounting for 82% of catches in the Tapajos River. According to fishers, daily fish catches per fisher were higher outside PAs (effect size 0.33) than inside, whereas CPUE was higher inside PAs than outside (-0.27). Catches were negatively associated with forest cover (-0.20), whereas river landscape complexity was positively associated with fish catch (0.96) and CPUE (0.66). These results can support management strategies, from regional to large scales, by reinforcing the relevance of PAs in clear-water rivers and showing the influence of landscape on fish catches. Our collaboration with fishers provided robust baseline data that can be used to inform inclusive, precautionary, and adaptive policies for conservation of threatened rivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.