ReviewACS biomaterials science & engineering2025
Advancement in Scaffold-Based 3D Cell Culture Models for Osteosarcoma Drug Screening.
Review in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Composite Liquid Marble Templated Millimetric Capsule With Tunable Rigidity, Porosity, and Thermal Reconfigurability Toward 3D Cell Culture.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Bifunctional scaffolds: strategic bridges coordinating osteosarcoma therapy and bone regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteosarcoma (OS), an extremely aggressive bone cancer that primarily occurs in children and teenagers, continues to pose critical clinical challenges due to its high propensity for metastasis, resistance to conventional therapies, and lack of specific biomarkers for early detection. Despite advances in surgical techniques and chemotherapeutic regimens, patient outcomes remain suboptimal, predominantly because conventional two-dimensional (2D) cell culture systems do not accurately mimic the intricate tumor microenvironment (TME), which often results in limited success when translating preclinical results to clinical success. In response to the shortcomings, the field has shifted toward three-dimensional (3D) culture systems, which more accurately mimic the spatial, mechanical, and biochemical characteristics of native OS TME. This review systematically examines the evolution and current state of 3D OS models, with a particular focus on scaffold-based systems. These models, utilizing biomimetic scaffolds provide enhanced platforms for studying tumor-stroma interactions, drug responses, and chemoresistance. It also briefs the use of scaffold-free spheroid models, which, despite their utility in replicating certain aspects of tumor heterogeneity and cell-cell interactions, are limited in their ability to fully emulate the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.