Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41139771›Full record

ReviewAnnals of intensive care2025

The metabolic response to stress in critical illness: updated review on the pathophysiological mechanisms, consequences, and therapeutic implications.

Raphael Mottale, Claire Dupuis, Sylwia Szklarzewska, Jean-Charles Preiser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raphael MottaleDepartment of Intensive Care, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), CUB Hôpital Érasme, Brussels, Belgium. raphael.mottale@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8961-3986
Claire DupuisDepartment of Intensive Care, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), CUB Hôpital Érasme, Brussels, Belgium.
Sylwia SzklarzewskaDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), CUB Hôpital Érasme, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Charles PreiserDepartment of Internal Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), CUB Hôpital Érasme, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The understanding of the response to stress in critical illness has significantly improved in recent years. These adaptations unfold across acute, subacute, and chronic phases, with an early adaptive catabolic state, marked anabolic resistance, and a later transition toward recovery. The aim of this updated review is to summarize recent advancements focusing on pathophysiological changes in endocrine, immune, gut, and mitochondrial functions and their effects on the metabolic shift in energy production, using glycolysis and the utilization of lactate and ketones as alternative pathways to meet cellular energy demands. Advances in understanding key elements such as energy expenditure and autophagy have expanded our knowledge. Furthermore, there is increased interest in the consequences of an intense and prolonged stress response, which can lead to ICU-acquired weakness (ICU AW) and post-intensive care syndrome. Recent evidence indicates that higher protein strategies generally do not improve survival or functional recovery and may signal harm in patients with renal dysfunction, supporting cautious, phase-appropriate protein dosing rather than routine high targets. New concepts, such as chronic critical illness (CCI) and persistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism syndrome (PICS), have also emerged to characterize prolonged stress responses. For glycaemic management, intensive control offers no outcome benefit and increases hypoglycaemia risk; moderate targets are preferred. Parallel advancements in monitoring techniques, such as indirect calorimetry and body composition analysis, have improved the assessment of the consequences of the metabolic changes. Metabolomics has offered deeper characterisation of the metabolic response to stress and nutrition, highlighting key metabolic pathways and potential therapeutic targets. Integrating biomarkers and metabolomics to define clinical endotypes may help time the transition from catabolic to anabolic strategies and personalize nutrition and pharmacologic support at the bedside. New therapeutic avenues have emerged or are under investigation, including glycaemic control, nutritional strategies, and some specific interventions targeting key components of the metabolic response. In this context, we present a narrative review of the literature with a focus on the clinical consequences of the pathophysiological and metabolic response to stress, alongside therapeutic implications and future perspectives.

Indexed as

Anabolic resistanceAutophagyCritical careEarly macronutrient restrictionEnergy expenditureGlycaemic controlInsulin sensitivityMetabolomicsPost-intensive care syndrome

Identifiers

PMID41139771
PMCPMC12554859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.