ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2026
Risk factors for post-craniotomy intracranial infections: a retrospective analysis of 742 cases.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intraoperative Cytokines and Postcraniotomy Infection in Benign Brain Tumors: An Exploratory Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIntracranial infection, as a complication of craniotomy, has a relatively low incidence rate. However, completely preventing post-craniotomy intracranial infections (PCI) remains challenging. Although established protocols exist for managing PCI, patients with severe infections still face risks of disability and mortality. This study aims to analyze high-risk factors for intracranial infections after craniotomy and explore preventive and management strategies to provide guidance for clinical practice.
methodsThe authors retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 742 patients who underwent craniotomy between July 2018 and December 2024. 31 cases of PCI were included in the case group, while 711 non-infected cases served as the control group. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and surgical data were compared between the two groups. Univariate analysis and binary logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for intracranial infection.
resultsIn this study, the incidence of PCI in the authors' neurosurgery department was 4.18%. The infection group showed significantly higher rates of prolonged hospitalization, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class > 3, infratentorial surgery, and ventricular drainage placement compared to the control group. Conversely, the infection group had significantly lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (all p < 0.05). Univariate analysis identified emergency surgery, reoperation, posterior fossa surgery, ventricular drainage placement, ASA > 3, postoperative CSF leakage, ICU admission, stress ulcers, hemoglobin ≤ 110.82 g/L, hyperlipidemia, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ≤ 0.89 mmol/L as significant risk factors (p < 0.05). Binary logistic regression revealed CSF leakage (OR: 19.28, 95% CI: 5.24-70.90) and ventricular drainage surgery (OR: 8.18, 95% CI: 2.53-26.39) as independent risk factors.
conclusionsPostoperative CSF leakage and ventricular drainage are critical risk factors for intracranial infection after craniotomy. Preventive measures, including meticulous watertight dural closure, preservation of the temporal muscle fascia during suturing, subcutaneous tunneling of ventricular drains, and improved postoperative drain management, may decrease infection rates. Timely CSF drainage and targeted antimicrobial therapy are essential for managing established infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41139736What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.