ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Susac syndrome - different treatment approaches for one disease (analysis of case series).
Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSusac syndrome is a rare, autoimmune, occlusive endotheliopathy that affects blood vessels in the central nervous system (CNS), retina, and inner ear. At initial medical evaluation, the classic triad of symptoms is present in less than one-third of patients, making diagnosis challenging.
methodsA brief review and retrospective analysis of the course, disease activity, exacerbations, and treatment of four patients with Susac syndrome.
resultsThe mean age of the patients was 25.8 years, and the average disease duration was 183.5 months +/- 90.65. The clinical triad was observed at the onset of the disease in only one patient. The first patient with predominant CNS symptoms was treated with prednisone, methotrexate, and sulfasalazine (IVIG and GCS i.v. were used during exacerbations). The next patient with exacerbation of ENT symptoms was treated with oral methylprednisolone (MP) and mycophenolate mofetil. The third patient had no clear predominance of any symptoms and responded well to azathioprine. The last patient presented mainly ophthalmological symptoms and was initially treated with cyclophosphamide (total dose 6200 mg) and IVIG. Later, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil were introduced.
conclusionsThe described cases highlight differences in the course of the disease and response to immunosuppressive therapy. Patients initially responded very well to high doses of GCS and IVIG. However, in addition to long-term remissions, relapses also developed. Therefore, individual treatment based on the principles of personalized medicine is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.