ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Robotic neck surgery using retroauricular approach - Experience of 60 procedures.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Institutional evolution of a robotic otolaryngology program across consecutive da Vinci Si, Xi, and SP platform transitions.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted excision of thyroglossal duct cyst: a scoping review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Reconfiguring robotic surgery in head and neck practice: transition from multi-port to single-port with early clinical outcomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remote access approaches to the neck have gained attention due to cosmetic concerns with conventional cervical incisions. Their safety, reproducibility, and oncologic outcomes remain to be fully validated. We retrospectively analyzed our initial experience with retroauricular robotic neck surgery using the Da Vinci system. Thirty-two patients were included. Data collected comprised demographics, procedure type, surgical features, and oncological follow-up. Thirty-five surgeries were performed: 13 posterolateral neck dissections (levels II-V) with central (VI), 5 modified radical dissections (I-V), 5 posterolateral dissections (II-V), and 1 super-selective neck dissection (I). Twelve neck dissections were combined with thyroidectomy. Additional procedures included 4 partial thyroidectomies, 3 submandibular gland resections, 3 schwannoma resections, and 1 branchial cyst excision, totaling 60 procedures. Twenty patients had malignant disease (62.5%). Median hospital stay was 2 days (range 1 9), similar to conventional approaches. Complications included 5 temporary nerve palsies, 1 lymphatic fistula, 1 transient hypoparathyroidism, and 1 minor flap necrosis, all managed conservatively; 1 hematoma required reoperation. Conversion to a conventional approach occured in 4 cases (6.7%). No additional intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. The mean lymph node yield was 54 in posterolateral/radical dissections and 13 in central dissections. Median follow-up of malignant cases was 41.3 months (range 18-56), with a 3-year regional control rate of 94.7%. Our experience with 60 retroauricular robotic procedures demonstrates this approach to be safe, feasible, and oncologically effective, with complication rates, hospital stay, and oncological outcomes comparable to conventional surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41139717What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.