Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41139717›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025

Robotic neck surgery using retroauricular approach - Experience of 60 procedures.

Antonio Augusto Bertelli, Bruno Vallim Monazzi, Thaís Tuasca Jareño, Leandro Augusto De Barros Silva, Rafael Guedes de Toledo Barros, Luiz Claudio Bosco Massarollo, Renan Bezerra Lira, Umamaheswar Duvvuri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Antonio Augusto BertelliHead and Neck Surgery Division, Department of Surgery - Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil. dr.bertelli@me.com.
Bruno Vallim MonazziServidor Público Municipal Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thaís Tuasca JareñoSanta Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leandro Augusto De Barros SilvaSanta Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences and Samaritano Higienópolis Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rafael Guedes de Toledo BarrosSão Luiz Morumbi Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Claudio Bosco MassarolloAlbert Einstein Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renan Bezerra LiraAlbert Einstein Hospital, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Umamaheswar DuvvuriDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery - NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remote access approaches to the neck have gained attention due to cosmetic concerns with conventional cervical incisions. Their safety, reproducibility, and oncologic outcomes remain to be fully validated. We retrospectively analyzed our initial experience with retroauricular robotic neck surgery using the Da Vinci system. Thirty-two patients were included. Data collected comprised demographics, procedure type, surgical features, and oncological follow-up. Thirty-five surgeries were performed: 13 posterolateral neck dissections (levels II-V) with central (VI), 5 modified radical dissections (I-V), 5 posterolateral dissections (II-V), and 1 super-selective neck dissection (I). Twelve neck dissections were combined with thyroidectomy. Additional procedures included 4 partial thyroidectomies, 3 submandibular gland resections, 3 schwannoma resections, and 1 branchial cyst excision, totaling 60 procedures. Twenty patients had malignant disease (62.5%). Median hospital stay was 2 days (range 1 9), similar to conventional approaches. Complications included 5 temporary nerve palsies, 1 lymphatic fistula, 1 transient hypoparathyroidism, and 1 minor flap necrosis, all managed conservatively; 1 hematoma required reoperation. Conversion to a conventional approach occured in 4 cases (6.7%). No additional intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. The mean lymph node yield was 54 in posterolateral/radical dissections and 13 in central dissections. Median follow-up of malignant cases was 41.3 months (range 18-56), with a 3-year regional control rate of 94.7%. Our experience with 60 retroauricular robotic procedures demonstrates this approach to be safe, feasible, and oncologically effective, with complication rates, hospital stay, and oncological outcomes comparable to conventional surgery.

Indexed as

NeckNeck DissectionRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesThyroidectomyTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultNeck dissectionNeck neoplasmsRobotic neck surgeryRobotic surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.