ArticleChinese medical journal2026
Induction alectinib or crizotinib for stage III NSCLC harboring ALK fusion: A study with 4-year follow-up.
Article in Chinese medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Perioperative Safety Analysis of Preoperative Targeted Therapy in Patients with ALK-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite increased response and long-term benefit of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring ALK -fusion, the role of induction ALK-TKIs in locally advanced NSCLC remained poorly investigated. This study aimed to demonstrate the short-term and long-term efficacy of ALK-targeted induction therapy in stage III lung cancer.
methodsWe consecutively collected data of patients from Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute since 2016, and those who were pathologically confirmed stages IIIA-IIIB NSCLC treated with induction ALK-TKIs initially were eligible for subsequent analysis. Patients' clinicopathological features as well as therapeutic management were fully reviewed. Analysis of longitudinal single-cell RNA sequencing from patients treated with alectinib were performed. Fisher's exact test was used to compare two categorical variable and Kaplan-Meier was applied for survival curve with estimation for median and 95% confidence interval (CI) value if available.
resultsForty stage III NSCLC patients treated with either alectinib or crizotinib were enrolled. Among those who had surgery, all patients had R0 resection without postoperative radiotherapy. Only two patients suffered grade 2 postoperative complications in terms of Clavien-Dindo score. Induction alectinib showed numerically superior pathological response compared with crizotinib with both major pathological response (MPR) (11/17, 64.7% vs. 6/13, 46.2%, P = 0.46) and complete pathological response (pCR) (6/17, 35% vs. 2/13, 15%, P = 0.41). Patients who received induction alectinib had significantly longer PFS (not reached [NR] vs. 17.9 months, P <0.001) and numerically improved overall survival (NR vs. NR, P = 0.092) compared with crizotinib. Brain metastasis remained the most common recurrent pattern after induction ALK-TKIs. Longitudinal single-cell RNA sequencing revealed increased tumor stemness and induced a more suppressive immune microenvironment in the residual tumor while highly inflamed microenvironment along with low infiltrating regulatory T cell and exhausted T cell was observed in resected specimens which achieved pCR.
conclusionInduction ALK-TKIs provided a clinically efficient and well-tolerated therapeutic strategy in locally advanced ALK-positive NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.