ArticleSexual health2025
Sexual health survey recruitment approaches among patients in community health centers.
Article in Sexual health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBlack and Latino communities are disproportionately affected by HIV, and are often underrepresented in sexual health research. It is crucial to understand their participation in research, and gauge the impact of non-response bias in reported results. A sequential multimodal approach to recruitment could potentially increase the response rates and representativeness of the sample by increasing the likelihood of response from the participants. However, data on the use of various recruitment approaches (i.e. low-barrier strategies) for engaging patients from urban Federally Qualified Health Centers in sexual health research are limited.
methodsWe analyzed survey recruitment data among patients prescribed PrEP at Federally Qualified Health Centers serving largely black and Latino/a communities to understand the impact of virtual recruitment. We used four sequential attempts over 6 months to recruit participants for an incentivized patient feedback survey on sexual health and PrEP services. We also examined demographic differences, including age, sexual identity, gender identity and race/ethnicity, between responders and non-responders.
resultsWe recruited participants from January to June 2022. The overall response rate was 20.8% (54/259). There was an incremental increase in responses based on the number of strategies used: 66.7% (36/54) of participants were recruited by using one strategy (email only), 22.2% (12/54) were recruited by using two strategies (email and phone calls) and 11.1% (6/54) were recruited using three (email, phone calls and SMS) or four strategies (email, phone calls, SMS and an additional phone call). Responders had received a more recent PrEP prescription compared with non-responders; mean ± s.d. months between the most recent PrEP prescription and the first recruitment attempt date of the study was 15 ± 17 months for responders and 27 ± 24 months for non-responders. We observed no other significant differences in demographic characteristics between responders and non-responders.
conclusionResponse rates to an online sexual health survey among urban Federally Qualified Health Center patients were low using sequential multimodal virtual recruitment approaches, particularly among those without recent healthcare engagement. There were no demographic differences between responders and non-responders. Findings highlight the need for alternative innovative methods for research engagement and to reduce potential bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.