Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41139478›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules & therapeutics2025

CAR-Based Cell and Gene Therapies: Global Clinical Landscape and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies from ClinicalTrials.gov.

Saerom Moon, Kyoung Song

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saerom MoonCollege of Pharmacy, Duksung Women's University, Seoul 01369, Republic of Korea.
Kyoung SongCollege of Pharmacy, Duksung Women's University, Seoul 01369, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-based cell and gene therapies have become transformative treatments, offering targeted and durable responses, especially in hematologic malignancies. This review analyzes 1,744 CAR clinical trials registered on Clinical-Trials.gov as of 2024, focusing on platform types, indications, target antigens, therapeutic strategies, and late-phase development. CAR-T therapies predominate, followed by CAR-NK, CAR-NKT, CAR-M and CAR-DC platforms. Approximately 92% of trials target tumors, with hematologic malignancies accounting for 65% of indications; CD19 and BCMA are primary targets in Phase 3 studies. Solid tumor applications are expanding steadily, driven by unmet clinical needs and advances in CAR engineering. Although monospecific CARs dominate, dual, bispecific, and universal designs are gaining traction to overcome antigen heterogeneity and tumor escape. Combination therapies, such as CAR-T with chemotherapy or monoclonal antibodies, are increasingly used to improve efficacy. CAR-NK therapies, while in early development, show promise due to favorable safety profiles and off-the-shelf allogeneic potential. The United States and China lead global development, supported by robust research ecosystems and industrial investment. Overall, CAR-based therapeutics are evolving from hematologic specialization toward broader clinical application, addressing challenges and guiding future strategies.

Indexed as

CAR-NKCAR-TCell and gene therapyChimeric antigen receptor

Identifiers

PMID41139478
PMCPMC12580648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.