ArticleInternational wound journal2025
Standardised Algorithm for Peri- and Postoperative Wound Management Using Fish Skin Grafts and Octenidine in Head-Neck Surgery.
Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Standardised Algorithm for Peri- and Postoperative Wound Management Using Fish Skin Grafts and Octenidine in Head-Neck Surgery.International wound journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex reconstructions are often required after head and neck tumour resections, particularly in irradiated fields and areas with exposed bone. Fish skin grafts (FSG) have recently emerged as a potential adjunct in difficult wound healing. This case report series evaluates the effectiveness of FSG in combination with octenidine-based antiseptics, which have already shown beneficial results in split-thickness skin transplantation in high-risk patients, focusing on the time period for granulation and wound closure. Five patients with seven defects of different aetiology in the head and neck region received FSG applications. Defect sizes ranged from 2 × 4 cm (occipital) to 7 × 6 cm (temporal). Granulation was determined, with irradiated and non-irradiated wounds analysed separately. In three consecutive cases, octenilin gel (octenidine-based hydrogel) was implemented in the treatment regimen. Three patients achieved complete granulation, while two reached 66%-80% granulation. Non-irradiated wounds demonstrated faster granulation (mean 16.5 days) compared to irradiated wounds (mean 48.8 days). Although there was no statistical significance, a trend toward delayed healing in irradiated tissue was observed. Patients treated with octenilin gel showed favourable healing outcomes, including shorter granulation times. Despite the poor prognosis for uncomplicated healing in this cohort, both treatment protocols-octenisept with Flaminal forte and octenisept with octenilin gel-achieved satisfactory outcomes when combined with FSG transplantation. This approach appears promising for reconstruction in challenging head and neck wounds and warrants further evaluation in prospective clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.