Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41139432›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie2025

Democratic Backsliding Based on Illusions: Authoritarians' Biased Perception of Media Freedom Contributes to Their Political Support.

Márton Hadarics

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Márton HadaricsInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8203-448X

Funding

European Union - Horizon Europe 101132601Hungarian Academy of Sciences BO/00662/25/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Authoritarianism plays a pivotal role in shaping anti-democratic preferences, including support for institutional restrictions on free speech. In this study, we present empirical evidence that authoritarianism undermines public discourse not only through such antidemocratic views but also by fostering ignorance regarding problems with freedom of speech. The study aims to demonstrate that authoritarianism is associated with a more positive perception of media freedom, particularly in contexts where such freedom is more problematic. Using multilevel structural equation modelling and representative data from 31 European countries in the European Social Survey (N = 59,685), we found that authoritarianism correlates with perceptions of media freedom (b = 0.45; p < 0.001), and indirectly, through this perception, with political support-indicated by political trust (b = 0.12; p < 0.001), satisfaction with democracy (b = 0.16; p < 0.001) and satisfaction with the government (b = 0.13; p < 0.001). Moreover, the association between authoritarianism and perceived media freedom is stronger in countries with weaker actual media freedom (b = -0.03; p = 0.016). These findings underscore how authoritarianism contributes to support for antidemocratic regimes that curtail the boundaries of public discourse, often fueled by biased perceptions of free speech opportunities.

Indexed as

AuthoritarianismDemocracyFreedomIllusionsMass MediaPoliticsPublic OpinionSocial PerceptionAdultEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTrustYoung Adultauthoritarianismfreedom of speechmotivated perceptionmultilevel modellingpolitical support

Identifiers

PMID41139432
PMCPMC12554430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.