Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41139391›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of primatology2025

Estimating the Abundance of Widely Distributed Primates.

Ray Hilborn, Milani Chaloupka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of primatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ray HilbornSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2326-2305
Milani ChaloupkaEcological Modelling Services Pty Ltd and Marine Spatial Ecology Lab, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8109-005X

Funding

This study was supported by National Association for Biomedical Research.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring the abundance of widely distributed animals poses many logistic challenges, and is rarely done because the wide distribution generally suggests a lack of conservation concern and thus funding. However, as there are increasing concerns about the conservation status of some widely distributed primates, evidence based management requires estimates of abundance. In this paper we review how such estimates can be done and have been done for some animals. We also explore in depth the one attempt to do so for a primate, the long-tailed macaque. We identify weaknesses in the work that has been done and suggest how a reliable estimate could be obtained.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesMacacaPrimatesAnimalsPopulation Densityabundance estimationlong‐tailed macaquestwo‐step sampling

Identifiers

PMID41139391
PMCPMC12554351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.