Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41139373›Full record

Trial reportQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025

Mapping the modified rankin scale (mRS) onto the assessment of quality of life (AQoL) utilities.

Lan Gao, Neha Das, Nam Le, Mohammadreza Mohebbi, Wei Luo, Gang Chen

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lan GaoFaculty of Health, School of Health & Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, VIC, 3220, Geelong, Australia.
Neha DasFaculty of Health, School of Health & Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, VIC, 3220, Geelong, Australia. dasneh@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2426-9622
Nam LeFaculty of Science, Engineering and Built Environment, School of Information Technology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Melbourne, Australia.
Mohammadreza MohebbiFaculty of Health, Biostatistics unit, Deakin University, VIC, 3220, Geelong, Australia.
Wei LuoFaculty of Science, Engineering and Built Environment, School of Information Technology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Melbourne, Australia.
Gang ChenCentre for Health Policy, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie St, VIC, 3053, Carlton, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEconomic evaluations need data from preference-based measures (PBM) to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Clinical trials often do not collect this data, which has prompted the development of mapping techniques. One such utility instrument to measure quality of life is the Assessment of Quality of Life-4D(AQoL-4D) and a widely used measure to assess global disability in stroke trials is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Thus, mapping techniques to link the mRS score with a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) such as AQoL-4D, is useful for health economists working in stroke.

methodThe data were obtained from the AVERT trial (A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial after stroke), a pragmatic, prospective, parallel-group, multicentre, international, randomised control trial. Seven econometric models were used to map mRS onto AQoL-4D: ordinary least square (OLS), robust MM-estimator, Generalised linear model (GLM), Generalised additive model (GAM), beta-based mixture model (betamix), Tobit model, and adjusted limited dependent variable mixture model (aldvmm). Five-fold internal cross-validation was performed to assess internal validity. Model performance was assessed using a series of goodness-of-fit measures.

resultFour models were developed: Model 1a: using the mRS score, age and gender as the key predictive variable; Model 1b: Model 1a without age and gender as predictors; Model 2a: using the set of binary variables of mRS scores, age and gender as the key predictive variable and; Model 2b: Model 2a without the impact of age and gender as predictors. The robust MM estimator was the preferred mapping algorithm for the overall sample with the smallest mean absolute error in cross-validation (0.1368 and 0.1364) for models 2a and 2b, respectively, which was considered acceptable.

conclusionThe developed mapping algorithm enables cost-utility analyses of interventions for people with stroke where the data for mRS has been collected. The availability of this mapping algorithm will facilitate future economic evaluation for stroke interventions when only the mRS is used.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeStroke RehabilitationAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, EconometricProspective StudiesQuality-Adjusted Life YearsStrokeSurveys and QuestionnairesAQoLMappingmRSStroke

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.