Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41139362›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2025

Factors associated with research activity among radiologists: results of a Nordic survey.

Pyry Jylhä-Vuorio, Irina Rinta-Kiikka, Anne Mäkikangas, Jussi Hirvonen, Tiina Luukkaala, Otso Arponen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pyry Jylhä-VuorioDepartment of Radiology, Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, Hämeenlinna, Finland. pyry.jylha-vuorio@omahame.fi.
Irina Rinta-KiikkaDepartment of Radiology, Tampere University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Anne MäkikangasWork Research Centre, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Jussi HirvonenDepartment of Radiology, Tampere University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Tiina LuukkaalaHealth Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University and Development and Innovation Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Otso ArponenDepartment of Radiology, Tampere University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch activities often compete with clinical work and personal life for the time of physician-scientists. To overcome barriers to research, examining the factors affecting research productivity is important.

objectivesTo identify potential personal, physician-dependent, and external physician-independent factors affecting researcher productivity in a cohort of Nordic radiologists.

methodsA prospective survey was open to responders from 10 May 2023 to 23 June 2023. The survey was distributed to radiologists and radiology residents in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden) through multiple channels. We collected demographic information, details about work and academic careers, and opinions and attitudes on work, research, and personal life using a Likert-scale questionnaire.

resultsA total of 192 participants responded (mean age 46.4 (SD: 11.03), 88 (45.8%) males, 103 (53.6%) females). Of the 134 (69.8%) respondents who reported having made any past academic contribution, 88 (46.4%) indicated active research participation. Active researchers expressed more agreement that they have the skills (p < 0.001) and resources (p < 0.001) for research and are able to maintain expertise (p = 0.003). Responders most frequently reported that having time for research (n = 94/155, 60.6%), motivation (n = 56/155, 36.1%), more funding (n = 36/155, 23.2%), and a higher salary (n = 36/155, 23.2%) would increase research involvement.

conclusionsWe identified several differences between radiologists who are active in research and those who are not. The participants identified time, financial means, and motivation as key factors that could increase research involvement. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Academic radiologists with active research careers report having the necessary skills and resources for research, teaching, and learning more frequently than radiologists less active in research. KEY POINTS: Active researchers are more in agreement with having the skills and resources for research. Active researchers expressed more agreement with interest in teaching, keeping expertise up to date, getting enough sleep, and being less distracted by social media. Researchers with a recent history of funding reported more publications. There may be research potential for physicians engaged in self-financed research.

Indexed as

Academic radiologyBarriers to researchPhysician-scientistRadiological researchSurvey

Identifiers

PMID41139362
PMCPMC12554850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.