Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41139361›Full record

Trial reportInternational urology and nephrology2026

Comparison of retrograde ıntrarenal surgery performed with thulium fiber laser lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of 20-30 mm kidney stones in adults: a randomized prospective study.

Mucahit Macit, Saban Oguz Demirdogen, Fatih Ozkaya, Tugay Aksakalli, Senol Adanur, Ozkan Polat

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mucahit MacitDepartment of Urology, Bayburt State Hospital, Bayburt, Türkiye. macit002@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1295-6742
Saban Oguz DemirdogenDepartment of Urology, Ataturk University Medical Faculty, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8697-8995
Fatih OzkayaDepartment of Urology, Ataturk University Medical Faculty, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7776-4231
Tugay AksakalliDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6781-738X
Senol AdanurPresident of the Turkish Endourology Association, Department of Urology, Ataturk University Medical Faculty, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2508-199X
Ozkan PolatDepartment of Urology, Ataturk University Medical Faculty, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9961-662X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to contribute to the literature by investigating whether Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRC) performed with Thulium Fiber Laser Lithotripsy (TFLLT) can be an alternative to Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PNL), which is still considered the gold standard, for the treatment of kidney stones measuring 20-30 mm, a more invasive procedure. Between April 2022 and June 2024, patients with a single kidney stone (Guy stone score 1) located in the renal pelvis, lower pole, or middle pole, measuring between 20-30 mm, were randomized at the Urology Clinic of Atatürk University Research Hospital. A total of 86 patients were included in the study. 44 patients (51.1%) underwent RIRS with TFLLT, and 42 patients (48.8%) underwent PNL. The mean stone size was 24.7 ± 1.8 mm in the RIRS group and 24.8 ± 1.7 mm in the PNL group. There was no statistically significant difference in demographics and stone characteristics between the two groups (p0.05). Stone-free rates were statistically similar between the two groups (p=0.714). The mean operative time was longer in the RIRS group, while the mean hemoglobin decrease and hospital stay were longer in the PNL group (p0.001). No statistically significant difference was found in postoperative complications between the groups (p=0.806). In the treatment of kidney stones measuring 20-30 mm, RIRC with TFLLT provides advantages over PNL, including lower blood loss, shorter hospitalization, lower fluoroscopy time, less postoperative pain, and lower analgesic consumption. With similar complication and stone-free rates, thulium fiber laser lithotripsy (TFLLT) performed via retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) may have the potential to be a safe and effective alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). Further studies with larger patient series will contribute to the literature.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiLithotripsy, LaserNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousThuliumAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesThuliumPercutaneous nephrolithotomyRetrograde intrarenal surgeryThulium fiber laserUrolithiasis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.