ArticleExperimental physiology2026
Correlated amplitudes of potentials evoked in homologous muscles by magnetic stimulation reveal positive covariation of corticospinal output.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of online motor cortex transcranial ultrasound stimulation on interhemispheric inhibition.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- A method of compensating for the excitability of spinal motoneurones when estimating the magnitude of potentials evoked in skeletal muscles.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Correlated amplitudes of potentials evoked in homologous muscles by magnetic stimulation reveal positive covariation of corticospinal output.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is widely held that in human, fibres of the corpus callosum mediate inter-hemispheric inhibition - deemed necessary to prevent a bilateral cerebrum from generating simultaneous and potentially conflicting outputs. Ostensible support comes from an electrophysiological phenomenon whereby the mean magnitude of 'test' motor evoked potentials (MEPs) obtained in response to magnetic stimuli delivered over the contralateral motor cortex is diminished when initial 'conditioning' magnetic stimuli have been applied 6-15 ms previously to the opposite motor cortex. A contrary view is that this phenomenon masks, rather than reveals, normal physiological processes. An alternative hypothesis is that cortical motor centres giving rise to efferent projections onto motoneurons innervating homologous muscles conduct reciprocal shaping of excitation. This hypothesis was examined in a large sample (205 participants) by correlating the amplitude of MEPs elicited by a conditioning stimulus (CS) with the amplitude of those elicited 10 ms later by a test stimulus (TS). The magnitudes of responses to the CS and TS were positively correlated. This remained the case following statistical compensation for an observed covariation of low amplitude fluctuations in the background (<2 µV root mean squared) electromyographic activity recorded in the (homologous) target muscles prior to stimulation. Although the coefficients representing the magnitude of association between responses to the CS and TS are small (rho < 0.20), they are reliable. These findings support the hypothesis that there is positive covariation in the excitability of corticospinal projections from the two cerebral hemispheres to homologous muscles of the upper limb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.