ArticleChemical senses2025
Free odor identification engages domain-general cognitive abilities in old adults.
Article in Chemical senses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-Related Variation in Odor Identification Performance in Children Assessed with the Brief Smell Identification Test.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cellular redox status is linked to olfactory alterations in cognitive decline.Redox biology · 2026Article
- Alzheimer's disease and cerebrovascular biomarkers in relation to odor identification in a naturalistic clinical cohort.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Naming common odors can be an exceptionally challenging task even for young and healthy individuals. Due to this difficulty, tests of cued odor identification (OID) are used instead of free odor identification in cognitive, neuropsychological, or aging research. Consequently, our understanding of the cognitive demands of free OID is limited. In this study, we analyze the demographic and cognitive factors that influence OID responses of old adults. We utilize a uniquely large dataset (n = 2,479) from a population-based sample of healthy, older Swedish adults (ages 58-102) who participated in free and cued OID using the 16-item Sniffin' TOM test. The free OID naming responses were categorized as correct, misnamings, or omissions. The results revealed that omissions are surprisingly prevalent, constituting 66.4% of errors and accounting for 87.7% of the age-related differences in task performance. Additionally, we hypothesized that successful free OID would be more closely linked to nonolfactory cognitive abilities, such as verbal fluency, vocabulary, and episodic memory proficiency. This hypothesis was supported, as we found significant associations between free OID and these cognitive abilities, while cued OID identification only was associated with perceptual speed. Our findings suggest that the assessment of free OID may provide valuable insights into odor-based cognition, indicating a need for further research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.