ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Defining the Surgical Oncology Experience during General Surgery Residency: A Multi-Institutional Study from the US ROPE Consortium.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ASO Author Reflections: Reconsidering the Role of Preoperative Biopsy in Early Stage Lung Cancer: It Could Be a Risk.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical oncology operative experience during general surgery residency is poorly characterized. We hypothesized that graduates pursuing the Complex General Surgical Oncology (CGSO) fellowship would have greater surgical oncology exposure and log more surgical oncology relevant (SOR) cases. PATIENTS AND
methodsDemographics, program characteristics, and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs were collected from 20 general surgery residency programs in the US Resident OPerative Experience (ROPE) Consortium spanning 2010-2020. CGSO matriculants (CGSO group) were compared with graduates entering other surgical fellowships/practice (non-CGSO group). SOR cases included liver, pancreas, breast, endocrine, laparoscopic colorectal, and abdominoperineal resection.
resultsAmong 1343 graduates, 80 (6%) pursued CGSO fellowships. Demographics, including sex, race/ethnicity, and underrepresented in medicine, were similar between groups (all p > 0.05). CGSO matriculants more often graduated from university-based programs with CGSO-trained faculty (95% vs 86%), dedicated surgical oncology divisions (81% vs 66%), and National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated Cancer Centers (85% vs 68%, all p < 0.05). Median total cases were similar between groups; however, CGSO-bound graduates logged greater SOR procedures (162 vs 141), including liver (+4), pancreas (+10), endocrine (+7), and laparoscopic colorectal (+5, all p < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with CGSO matriculation included departmental NIH funding (OR 4.82, 95% CI 1.18-19.79, p = 0.02), dedicated research experience (OR 5.62, 95% CI 3.02-10.44, p < 0.001), and increased SOR cases (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001-1.01, p = 0.02).
conclusionsCGSO matriculants have a unique general surgery training experience and log more SOR cases, which could reflect efforts to prepare for fellowship and/or the influence of surgical oncology immersion on career interest. These data highlight opportunities to bolster CGSO recruitment and fellowship preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41139184What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.