ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Mesenteric angiography for colonic diverticular bleeding: clinical and technical predictors of extravasation and post-procedural outcomes.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo predict active extravasation during angiography for colonic diverticular bleeding confirmed by CT angiogram (CTA) and examine the effect of procedural factors on clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsMesenteric angiograms performed at three hospitals for colonic diverticular bleeding on CTA between 2016 and 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. Data collection included CTA-to-angiogram time, extravasation and inferior vena cava size, angiogram selectivity, provocative maneuvers, and embolization techniques. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to find associations between pre-procedural variables and active extravasation on angiography. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients who were or were not embolized.
resultsOne hundred seventeen patients (median age, 76 years (IQR 16), 42 women) underwent 146 angiograms. Active extravasation was found in 40% of angiograms. CTA-to-angiogram time ≤ 4 h (OR = 2.95; CI: 1.17-7.73; p = 0.02), inferior vena cava short axis ≥ 20 mm (OR = 3.63; CI: 1.24-11.6, p = 0.02) and age (OR = 1.06; CI: 1.01-1.12; p = 0.01) were independent predictors for active bleeding on angiography in a multivariate logistic model (AUC: 0.81, CI: 0.72-0.89; p < 0.01). Angiography beyond the named arterial branch revealed more bleeding than main trunk angiography (34% vs 21%). 51/58 (88%) positive and 15 negative angiograms were embolized. Patients with targeted embolization had less rebleeding (10% vs 44%, p < 0.05) and post-procedure colonoscopies (17% vs 51%, p < 0.05).
conclusionMesenteric angiography had a 40% positivity rate for diverticular bleeding after CTA, with a higher yield if performed within 4 h, sub-selectively, and after resuscitation. Targeted embolization decreased rebleeding and post-procedure colonoscopies. KEY POINTS: Question Colonic diverticular bleeding identified on CTA is treated with angiography and embolization, but diagnostic yield and embolization outcome are extrapolated from all-cause lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Findings Extravasation was identified in 40% of angiograms, with better yield if performed ≤ 4 h after positive CTA and sub-selectively. Targeted embolization reduced rebleeding and post-procedural colonoscopies. Clinical relevance Patients with colonic diverticular bleeding with active extravasation on CTA should be vigorously resuscitated and undergo prompt mesenteric angiography. This increases the likelihood of visualizing active extravasation and targeted embolization, leading to less rebleeding and further procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41139171What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.