Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41139158›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

The processing of multiple letters and multiple words in deaf adults.

Veena Kamble, Michele Scaltritti, Virginie Crollen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Veena KambleInstitut de recherche en sciences psychologiques (IPSY), Université catholique de Louvain, Place du Cardinal Mercier, 10, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, Belgium. veena.kamble@uclouvain.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8983-4172
Michele ScaltrittiDipartimento di Psicologia e Scienze Cognitive, Università degli Studi di Trento, Trento, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3328-1748
Virginie CrollenInstitut de recherche en sciences psychologiques (IPSY), Université catholique de Louvain, Place du Cardinal Mercier, 10, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1583-3844

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Readers utilize both foveal and parafoveal information to recognize letters and words effectively. In the fovea, the ability to identify letters is maximized, resulting in greater accuracy for letters that are directly fixated upon. Conversely, the accuracy of letter identification diminishes in the parafovea. Notably, letters at the beginning and end of words are often recognized more accurately than those in the middle, which yields a W-shaped function in identification accuracy and an M-shaped function in response times. Building upon these observations, word identification rates are higher for strings presented in the foveal area. Due to an attentional bias toward reading direction, there exists a greater ability to identify words in the right parafovea compared to the left. Given that deaf readers display a distinct distribution of visual attention, the present study aims to investigate, using a Rapid Parallel Visual Presentation paradigm, whether deaf readers differ in their ability to identify letters and words. Participants were presented with three-letter nonword and word sequences at foveal and parafoveal positions and instructed to identify post-cued letter and word targets. While both groups demonstrated the W-shaped accuracy function for letter identification, response times for deaf readers were characterized by a distinct M-shaped pattern, particularly for letters in the right visual field (RVF). Hearing participants exhibited a RVF advantage in word identification; however, deaf participants displayed a reduced RVF advantage, suggesting a more bilateral distribution of visual attention during reading. These results indicate that deafness leads to subtle yet significant differences in letter and word identification processes.

Indexed as

AttentionDeafnessFovea CentralisPattern Recognition, VisualPsycholinguisticsReadingVisual FieldsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultDeafnessLetter identificationParafoveal processingRPVPVisual attentionWord identification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.