ArticleVaccine2025
Near real-time surveillance and tree-based data mining to assess the safety of respiratory syncytial virus vaccines in older adults in the vaccine safety datalink.
Article in Vaccine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AS01Drug safety · 2026Article
- Real-world evidence on RSV vaccine uptake, effectiveness, and safety in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTwo respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines, Pfizer's Abrysvo and GSK's Arexvy, were licensed in 2023 in the U.S. However, population-based assessments of their safety in adults ≥60 years have not been widely published. We provide results from two complementary investigations of vaccinated adults in the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD).
methodsThe rapid cycle analysis (RCA) used a sequential cohort design and biweekly analyses of near real-time data to compare the incidence of 12 pre-specified outcomes in two post-vaccination risk intervals (1-21, 1-42 days) with the incidence in comparison intervals. The surveillance period was August 1, 2023, through September 28, 2024; nine of 13 VSD sites participated. Statistically significant signals were investigated by medical record review with re-analysis of confirmed outcomes. The self-controlled tree-based data mining analysis was designed to identify temporal clustering of ICD-10 diagnosis codes in the inpatient or emergency department settings 1-56 days post-vaccination, without pre-specifying outcomes or risk intervals. The study period was July 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023; 10 sites participated.
resultsThe RCA analysis included 436,823 persons who received an RSV vaccine. No statistical signal was identified for 11 of 12 adverse events. A signal was detected for immune thrombocytopenic purpura following Arexvy, but re-analysis following medical record review did not confirm an association. The tree-based data mining analysis included 248,056 vaccinees, identified 53,734 counts of 3429 diagnosis codes, and identified no statistically significant clusters for either vaccine.
conclusionsThese post-licensure safety assessments provide evidence supporting the safety of RSV vaccines in older adults. As more data accrue, additional monitoring is warranted for rare adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.