ArticleBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
Tomographic comparison of the cochlea, oval window, round window and facial nerve between adults and children and their influence on cochlear implant surgery.
Article in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIs to compare two tomographic measurements that can be used to predict the visibility of the round window: the angle formed by the junction of the line that goes from the round window Membrane Center Point (MJR) to the Facial Nerve surface (FN) with the Coronal Plane (CP) traced over this surface (RWM-FN-CP Angle) and the vertical distance between the midpoint of the RWM and this Coronal Plane (RWM-CP Vertical Distance); in adults and children, in order to verify if there are significant differences between the groups, which would justify the greater surgical difficulty caused by the lower visibility of the RW in children.
methodsIn this retrospective study, the RWM-FN-CP angle and the RWM-CP vertical distance were measured in Computerized Tomography Scans (CT) of patients who underwent CI surgeries.
results32 individuals who underwent CT in the period 2015-2018, 16 adults aged 27-73 years, and 16 children, with a mean age of 3.4 (±2.7) years were evaluated. The mean of the RWM-FN-CP angle in children was significantly lower, than the mean in adults. The mean RWM-CP vertical distance in children was significantly lower than the mean in adults (p = 0.0001).
conclusionIn children, the RWM-FN-CP angle is more acute, and the measured MJR-PC vertical distance is smaller when compared to adults. The anatomical differences observed in the tomographies justify the lower visibility of the RW during the surgical act of cochlear implantation in children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.