Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41138160›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Effect of indigestible dietary protein on growth performance and health status of weaned pigs.

Taiwo J Erinle, Marllon J K de Oliveira, John K Htoo, S Maria Mendoza, Daniel A Columbus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Taiwo J ErinlePrairie Swine Centre, Inc., Saskatoon, SK S7H 5N9, Canada.
Marllon J K de OliveiraPrairie Swine Centre, Inc., Saskatoon, SK S7H 5N9, Canada.
John K HtooEvonik Operations GmbH, Hanau-Wolfgang 63457, Germany.
S Maria MendozaEvonik Corporation, Kennesaw, GA 30144.
Daniel A ColumbusPrairie Swine Centre, Inc., Saskatoon, SK S7H 5N9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3335-6973

Funding

Evonik Operations GmbH, and Mitacs IT27881Government of Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture and the Canadian Agricultural Partnership 20210571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feeding diets containing excess dietary protein (DP) is associated with increased hindgut protein fermentation, often resulting in post-weaning diarrhea. However, the response to DP content has been variable in piglets. The indigestible dietary protein (IDP) content of diets may be more related to negative health and performance outcomes than total DP. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of diet IDP content on performance, immune response, and fecal consistency score (FCS) in newly weaned pigs. Eighty mixed-sex weaned pigs with an average initial body weight of 8.1 ± 0.31 kg were housed in groups of 5 pigs/pen and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 dietary treatments in a completely randomized design (n = 8 pens/treatment) for 28 d. Diets were formulated to contain similar total crude protein (22% [phase I] and 20% [phase II]), net energy, and to meet or exceed all other nutrient requirements, but differ in IDP content (low IDP, 2.74% [LIDP] or high IDP, 4.2% [HIDP]). During the first 7 d, FCS was visually scored, followed by a weekly FCS and growth performance measurements. On d 9 post-weaning, blood, digesta from ileum, cecum, and colon, and fecal samples were collected in the morning from 1 pig/pen without prior fasting. Additional blood was also collected from 1 pig/pen on d 28. There was no effect of IDP on feed intake (P > 0.10). Low IDP increased average daily gain by 7% during phase II and 4% during the overall period compared to HIDP (P < 0.05). Gain:feed was lower and higher in LIDP-fed pigs during phases 1 and 2, respectively, compared to HIDP (P < 0.05). Pigs fed LIDP diet had improved FCS on d 6 and overall compared to HIDP (P < 0.01). Plasma superoxide dismutase concentration was higher in LIDP-fed pigs compared to HIDP (P < 0.05). There was neither IDP, Day, nor their interaction effect on serum albumin, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and plasma alkaline phosphatase (P > 0.10). Oxidized glutathione (GSSG) was higher on d 28 in LIDP-fed pigs compared to d 9 (P < 0.05); but GSSG in pigs fed HIDP on both days. In the cecum, LIDP increased the concentrations of cadaverine, spermine, allantoin, creatinine, and N1-acetylspermidine (P < 0.05) and reduced phenylethylamine, tryptamine, and choline (P < 0.05). High IDP increased valerate concentration in the colonic digesta (P < 0.05). The results indicate that feeding LIDP diet improved growth performance and oxidative status, reduced diarrhea severity, while increasing some biogenic amines in nursery pigs.

Indexed as

Dietary ProteinsAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDigestionFecesFemaleMaleRandom AllocationSwineWeaningDietary Proteinsacute-phase proteinantioxidant statusdiarrhea severityinflammatory biomarkersmicrobial proteolytic fermentation metabolitesundigested dietary protein

Identifiers

PMID41138160
PMCPMC12620005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.