ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Investigating the Effects of Epac2 Activation in an In Vitro Cortical Mechanical Injury Model for Central Nervous System Repair.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of S-220-Loaded Silk Hydrogels on In Vitro Neurite Outgrowth in 2 and 3 Dimensions.Advanced biology · 2026Article
- Investigating the Effects of Epac2 Activation in an In Vitro Cortical Mechanical Injury Model for Central Nervous System Repair.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, around 21 million people are currently living with a spinal cord injury (SCI), which causes loss of neural function and has no cure, creating substantial social and economic challenges. Several factors impede central nervous system (CNS) repair, including the limited intrinsic regenerative capacity of adult mammalian central nervous system neurons, the formation of cavities and glial scars, and the presence of inhibitory molecules at the injury site. Studies in an ex vivo SCI model suggest that exchange protein directly activated by cAMP 2 (Epac2) elevation by the agonist S-220 can transform a post-lesion inhibitory environment to one, which promotes axonal outgrowth. However, this ex vivo preparation did not allow the detailed and accurate assessment of responses of individual cell populations following injury. Moreover, it was unclear if S-220 conferred neuroprotection in the ex vivo model. To address these issues, here we use a relatively novel but simple in vitro model of CNS injury to further examine the effects of S-220 on all key CNS cell populations, as it included neurons, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocyte precursor cells. The results show that following S-220 treatment, Epac2 activation conferred neuroprotection to neurons and oligodendrocytes following the in vitro injury. It also produced a permissive postinjury environment by reducing astrogliosis and microgliosis, which resulted in increased axonal outgrowth into the injury gap. Our data therefore suggest that elevating Epac2 is a novel repair strategy for CNS injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.