ArticleScience China. Life sciences2026
The characteristics and prognostic analysis of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia patients in China.
Article in Science China. Life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to firstly explore characteristics and prognostic factors of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) in multi-center samples in China. We analyzed 228 t-AML patients from 14 centers across China. The median age at t-AML diagnosis was 52 years (range, 1.3-89 years). The median latency interval was 45.8 months (19.2-142.8 months). Next generation sequencing (NGS) results were available in 150 (65.8%) patients. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival rates of all t-AML were 58.3% and 63.7%, respectively. In t-AML patients, NPM1 mutation (85.0% vs. 54.4%, P=0.01), core binding factor (CBF) (RUNX1/RUNX1T1 and CBFβ/MYH11) (70.7% vs. 55.1%, P=0.03), and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) (86.0% vs. 67.9%, P=0.02) were associated with significantly better OS, while the 2022 ELN intermediate-adverse risk group had worse OS than the favorable group (55.9% vs. 73.1%, P=0.02). In multivariable analyses, NPM1 mutation, CBF t-AML, primary tumor remission, WBC count ⩽15×10
Indexed as
Identifiers
41138035What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.