Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41138030›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026

How Often, where and by whom are Adverse Experiences Recorded in Clinical Records of Service-Users Under the Care of an Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service?

Hazel Davison, Matt Sopp, Alison Bennetts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hazel DavisonDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. H.davison@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0009-0003-9349-7991
Matt SoppHampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6634-1436
Alison BennettsDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2461-7868

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research indicates high prevalence rates of adverse experiences in people experiencing first-episode psychosis. Despite recommendations that mental health staff should routinely ask about adverse experiences, documentation indicates these are not being recorded in service-users' clinical records across different mental health settings. This study audited 48 service-user records in a UK early intervention in psychosis (EIP) community mental health service to examine how often, where, and by whom adverse experiences were recorded. Searching for 22 adverse experience terms, 64.6% of clinical records documented at least one adverse experience, with 80.6% reporting more than one. The profession that most often recorded adverse experiences in service-users' clinical records was psychiatrists. While EIP services may document adverse experiences more frequently than other community mental health settings, recorded rates remain lower than expected based on previous research prevalence rates. Further studies should consider adverse experiences recording across UK EIP services to ensure service-users with adverse experiences receive appropriate support.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesEarly Medical InterventionPsychotic DisordersAdultFemaleHumansMaleUnited KingdomAdverse experiencesAuditClinical recordsEIPPsychosis

Identifiers

PMID41138030
PMCPMC12852219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.